Political Ecology

We found food consumption was under-represented (25%) among general environmental impact calculators (n = 83). We identified eight carbon calculators that accounted for food consumption and included U.S. users among the target audience. Among these, meat and dairy consumption was appropriately highlighted as the primary diet-related contributor to emissions. Opportunities exist to improve upon these tools, including: expanding the scope of behaviors included under calculations; improving communication, in part by emphasizing the ecological and public health co-benefits of less emissions-intensive diets; and adopting more robust, transparent methodologies, particularly where calculators produce questionable emissions estimates. Further, all calculators could benefit from more comprehensive data on the U.S. food system. These advancements may better equip these tools for effectively guiding audiences toward ecologically responsible dietary choices.

doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.017

Related posts:

1. A Simple Model to Include Human Excretion in Life Cycle Assessment of Food Products
2. Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
3. Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers